LEAKAGE INDUCTANCE PART II

The non-linked flux between primary and secondary windings of transformers lead to what is commonly known as the leakage inductance. Its magnitude plays a key role in modern switched-mode power supplies. Whether it needs to be minimized or maximized, the use of complex prediction models, that are many times far from reality, is required. The objective of this paper is to provide a general idea of the leakage inductance range values found in different topologies and turns ratios.

CASES OF STUDY

As explained in previous application notes, two of the key parameters affecting the leakage inductance are the transformer turns ratio and winding arrangement. With the aim of having a reference when creating a design, a brief  summary of the leakage inductance measured will be provided for different transformer designs measured at Frenetic’s Laboratory.

Configuration 1       

Configuration 2

Configuration 3

Configuration 4

Figures: Winding arrangement configurations used for for the measurements.

Values of leakage inductance will be measured for different converters with four different winding configurations, from high-pot winding  arrangement (Conf. 1) to a two layers interleaving arrangement (Conf. 4) passing throug simple P-S configuration (Conf. 2) and simple interleaving (Conf. 3)

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:

Table 1 shows the converters used for this experiment for each topology with different configurations of windings. Results demonstrate how  the smaller the difference between primary and secondary turns, and the better the interleaving arrangement, the smaller the leakage  inductance achieved.

CASE 1:

Figure 2 shows how the leakage inductance is reduced 50% from Conf. 1 to Conf. 3 in a RM8/I. The more is the winding interleaved, the lower the leakage. Minimization of the leakage inductance in  flyback converters is generally a must. Otherwise high voltage spikes at the switching node would  be present with the increased stress that this involves in the semiconductors. Interleaved planar  transformer could be used in this case but taking special care of the parasitic capacitance that will create a path for common mode noise.

CASE 2:

In Figure 3, it has been used a PQ40/40 with turns ratio of 1:1. The Llk  is reduced by a factor of 4. The decrease on the leakage inductance appears as a consequence of the division of the  winding  on  higher  amount  of layers  with interleaving  arrangement,  from P-S  to  P-S-P-S arrangemen

CASE 3:

Case 3 uses the same core shape than in case 2 but with 8 times higher turns ratio (8:1).  Winding Conf. 1 and 2 does not seem very different, however, as we can see in the results, the  Llk is reduced 2.6 times, form 5.2 to 2 uH. Comparing to case 2, it seems to have lower Llk change, but talking in absolute values it has  higher impact, as in Case 2 the leakage is reduce 0.6 uH, and in Case 3 is of 3.2 uH.

CONCLUSIONS

From results shown on the experimenental cases, it can be concluded that as the turns ratio gets closer to 1, the coupling between windings  leads to leakage inductances bellow 1 uH. In cases where the turns ratio is higher, the winding configuration is of much importance to reduce  the leakage inductance, however, it will be still in considerable ranges of inductance, it can be reduced only up to a certain point.

TRY US

Previous


PHASE SHIFT FULL-BRIDGE MODULATION



PHASE SHIFT FULL-BRIDGE MODULATION


VIEW

Next


LEAKAGE INDUCTANCE MODELS



LEAKAGE INDUCTANCE MODELS


VIEW

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By clicking ACCEPT, you agree to SP Frenetic Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Policy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. By clicking ACCEPT, you agree to SP Frenetic Terms of Use & our Cookie Policy

ACCEPT